Since the economic collapse in 2008, (and apart from Brexit of course,) fewer news stories have rocked the construction world than Carillion declaring bankruptcy earlier this year. 20,000 jobs, thousands of subcontractor businesses and a large number of high-profile projects were immediately put at risk.
Two months on, and three public inquiries later, a range of catalysts have been unearthed to explain the implosion – from problem projects and disputes, to mismanagement at a senior level.
We focus on three common construction risks and how they can easily be avoided.

1. Tight margins and low tendering
Securing future work is imperative; if they think they’re capable of delivering timely projects for less money than their competitors, with riskier margins, then so be it.
Carillion have cited three major UK projects as the source of cash flow problems. One of them, the Aberdeen bypass, fell behind by nearly 12 months until the contractor was replaced.
Working with tight margins, gives little wiggle room for costly problems and delays. This potentially generates project losses rather than profit, which results in serious cash flow repercussions.
Solution: Better risk management and accurate tendering
The key is having the ability to calculate, predict and mitigate risks – having clear visibility of running project costs against budget is vital, so that you can flag issues, and deal with them immediately.
Payapps recommends:
- Accurate profit and loss reporting with visibility of supply chain payments across all projects and divisions
- Accurate data for risk assessment and tendering
2. Poor cashflow visibility
The company resorted to 126-day payment terms with some subcontractors – well over the 30 days set out by the Fair payment charter (of which Carillion were a member), owing over £800m in retention.
Increasing efficiency across the application for payment and approval process is essential in ensuring supply chains are paid on time, providing a sustainable cashflow to subcontractors. A 126-day payment term structure creates a level of risk that no supplier should be subject to.
Solution
A structured online system for managing the application for payment and approval process provides visibility of cashflow, reduces risk and saves time.
Payapps recommends:
- Comprehensive cashflow reporting to provide key critical information
- An improved application and payment notice process, with transparency of your supply chain payment process
3. Disputes
Carillion found themselves embroiled in a number of disputes. The most heavily referenced is their quarrel with Qatari developer Msheireb properties for the Downtown Doha project.
Ex-Chief Executive Richard Howson claims that the company was owed over £200m for the project; Msheireb claim that Carillion’s lack of cash flow caused project delays, and that when they had paid Carillion, the contractor didn’t use this money to pay their supply chain, incurring further charges to the client.
Solution:
Pay your supply chain on time, choose the best and most reliable subcontractors, keep a clear audit trail of processes (to cover your back) and ensure you have the cashflow to deliver the project.
Payapps recommends:
- Contract deliverables that set you apart from competitors – Accurate BIM and O&M manuals.
- Tools which give visibility to your subcontractors – Online payment applications, snagging/defects, BIM. These tools help with project delivery for your internal staff and they provide a clear audit trail in the event of a dispute.